E-ISSN: 2587-0351 | ISSN: 1300-2694
A Novel Model for Standalone Evaluation of Breast Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Prediction of BI-RADS Categories [Van Med J]
Van Med J. 2026; 33(3): 337-346 | DOI: 10.5505/vmj.2026.30633

A Novel Model for Standalone Evaluation of Breast Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Prediction of BI-RADS Categories

Yasin Selek1, Ata Turker Arikök2, Baki Hekimoğlu1, Irmak Durur-Subasi3
1University of Health Sciences, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Radiology, Ankara, Turkiye.
2University of Health Sciences, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Pathology, Ankara, Turkiye.
3Department of Senology, Institute of Senology, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University,Istanbul, Turkiye.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate whether Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categories can be determined using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) alone through a new evaluation model, and to compare DWI-based BI-RADS categorization with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) assessments and available histopathological findings.
METHODS: Anonymised DWI datasets of 400 consecutive patients were retrospectively reviewed, and 354 patients were involved in the final analysis using a newly developed classification model comprising lesion morphology and diffusion restriction patterns. For each patient, the highest BI-RADS category based on DWI was recorded. DWI-based BI-RADS categories were compared with the categories reported on MP-MRI and, when available, with histopathological results. Normalized apparent diffusion coefficient (nADC) values were calculated, and their diagnostic performance in distinguishing benign from malignant lesions was assessed.
RESULTS: Using MP-MRI as the reference standard, the DWI-based model achieved a sensitivity of 64%, specificity of 98%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 90%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 89%, and an overall accuracy of 89.5%. When histopathology was used as the reference, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were 87%, 68%, 70%, 86%, and 77%, respectively. Malignant lesions demonstrated significantly lower nADC values than benign lesions. An nADC threshold of 0.784 yielded a sensitivity of 68% and specificity of 73% for benign–malignant discrimination.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: A DWI-based standalone evaluation model incorporating diffusion patterns and morphological features demonstrates acceptable diagnostic performance for BI-RADS categorization and may provide practical guidance when DWI must be interpreted independently.

Keywords: Breast, diffusion-weighted imaging, BI-RADS, magnetic resonance imaging


Corresponding Author: Irmak Durur-Subasi, Türkiye
Manuscript Language: English
×
APA
NLM
AMA
MLA
Chicago
Copied!
CITE
LookUs & Online Makale